The arguments of Plato to Butler Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The arguments of Plato to Butler - Essay ExamplePlatos prisoners represent the ordinary people comprising the society that is yet to attain the right acquaintance and wisdom meant to go off themselves from their enslaving appetitive desires (Plato 53). This is similar to the Butlers society where Martha holds a long dialogue with divinity though, in this account, the protagonists represents her society. However, Marthas knowledge is much more elevated comp ared to the ordinary people whom God plans to enlighten through her. This is evident from the way she is able to brainstorm and come up with ideas (the idea of dreams) meant to get the ordinary people. Marthas knowledge or wisdom level is similar to Platos freed prisoners, who have returned to the countermine with a diverse perspective regarding how they view life besides other aspects. This is contrary to what they used to grasp things seemed like before they resurfaced in the cave. Besides, the bound prisoners deem their p eers who had the chance to go out and learn the humans of things possess corrupted form of insight where after arguing, they intend to terminate their lives. This is similar to Marthas representative where she is unwilling to return to the world once God assigns her the duty of educating His earthly beings. Since, she is afraid that they may efface her when she emerges with a different perspective regarding lifes predicaments and how to solve them (Butler 171). Both Platos prisoners and Marthas inability to comprehend Gods nature unveil humanitys mediocrity that is a want of knowledge. This is to liberate the entire society from its appetitive desires bounding it to unending ignorance hence there is need to employ able measures (of imparting knowledge) to eliminate them. Therefore, both Platos Allegory of the Cave and Butlers account The record of Martha bear the same approach concerning how to impart their respective societies with the right knowledge meant to thrive or deve lop. What do these authors want us to know? The authors via these accounts imply that, we usually see things from the perspective which lifes knowledge has prepared us. Hence, Butlers argument, You see what your life has prepared you to see, God said (Butler 209). Therefore, people disrespect drowning in their societys dubious mediocrity, will still persist to hold onto it, which is apparent from the cave prisoners stubbornness. These cave prisoners see their peers mind reformation as a corrupted way of thinking whereby they are ready to kill them, which is also similar in the Butlers account (Butler 171). Hence, people disdain their strong guest to advance their knowledge, normally lack internal liberty meant to accept it, whereby to some finis term any new idea as retarded mediocrity. Besides, the authors intend to imply the only hardly a(prenominal) enlightened people in the society end up assuming the top posts or travail key responsibilities meant to develop the ignorant c haracters. This is regardless of peers resistance. For illustration, Plato contends that, philosophers owing to their knowledge and wisdom ought to be kings, which is similar in the Butlers account (Plato 166). Martha after getting enlightenment, God proposes to use her in redeeming the world, where he comes with an idea of resurrecting her. However, Martha wonders why God does not utilize other individuals, but he continues to